GenPPT

McKinsey Slides: How to Build Consulting-Style Decks (2026)

McKinsey slides lead with the recommendation, use full-sentence action titles, and prove one message per slide. This guide has real slides, public decks to study, 24 copyable action titles, and a slide-by-slide template.

Ilias Ism

by Ilias Ism

Updated 36 min read

McKinsey Slides: How to Build Consulting-Style Decks (2026)

McKinsey slides follow three rules. The recommendation comes first, every slide title is a full-sentence action title, and each slide proves one message with one exhibit and a source line.

The structure comes from Barbara Minto's Pyramid Principle, which she developed at McKinsey in the 1960s and early 1970s. A McKinsey slide deck has five parts: cover, executive summary, body, recommendations, and appendix.

This guide shows real slides, public decks you can study, action titles you can copy, and a slide-by-slide template.

What makes a slide a McKinsey slide

Your steering committee already knows the company. It wants a decision, not a research tour. Each rule below exists to get a busy reader to that decision faster.

RuleWhat it meansQuick test
Answer firstThe recommendation is on the executive summary, before the proofCan a reader stop after slide 2 and know what you want?
Action titlesThe title is a full sentence that states the findingDoes the title contain a verb and a number or comparison?
One message per slideOne claim, one exhibit that proves itDo you need the word "and" to describe the slide? Split it.
MECE groupingSections do not overlap and leave no gapsCan any item sit in two sections?
Sources on every exhibitA source line under each chart or tableCan a skeptical reader trace each number?
Appendix disciplineDetail that does not change the decision moves to the backWould the decision change without this slide?

The rest of this guide takes each rule in turn. If you only have five minutes, read Action titles and the executive summary section.

Download: McKinsey-style templates

We found no official public download of McKinsey's internal PowerPoint template. The template here is a GenPPT-made 8-slide skeleton in the same style, as a PDF with fill-in placeholders.

Do you need a PowerPoint file? Generate the deck in GenPPT and export it as .pptx. For a template that you can edit box by box, set up your own in the Slide Master.

GenPPT prompt (copy and paste)

Use this at GenPPT or in the McKinsey slide generator. Fill in the three lines under "My engagement". Attach the template contact sheet as a style reference for navy and white consulting visuals.

Text
Consulting-style strategy deck (McKinsey-style slides).

Structure requirements:
- Lead with the recommendation on the executive summary slide (Pyramid Principle: answer first)
- Use action titles: every slide headline is a complete sentence stating the insight, not a topic label
- MECE sections: mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive groupings
- SCR storyline: Situation → Complication → Resolution
- One message per slide; one primary chart per slide
- Source footnote on every exhibit

Slide order (8-slide main path):
1. Cover: [Engagement title], [Client], [Date]
2. Executive summary: governing recommendation + 3 to 5 complete-claim bullets
3. Situation: stable context with baseline KPI chart
4. Complication: what broke the status quo (waterfall or bridge)
5. MECE overview: three levers that cover the full opportunity
6. Evidence: single chart proving key line 1
7. Competitive positioning: 2×2 matrix with defensible axes
8. Recommendations: numbered verb-led actions + next steps table (owner, deliverable, date)

My engagement:
- Audience: [Board / steering committee / client leadership]
- Governing recommendation: [State your answer in one sentence]
- Context: [Industry, company, decision at stake]

Visual style: navy and white executive palette, minimal decoration, large headline type, generous whitespace, professional consulting layout. Match the attached reference contact sheet for typography and density.

Real McKinsey slide examples (2024 webcast)

The examples below come from the slides of McKinsey's "Transforming for growth" webcast, dated November 14, 2024 and presented by three McKinsey partners. It is webcast material for an outside audience, not a client deck.

Use it to study how the firm writes action titles and builds charts today. The deck has 18 slides. It carries McKinsey's standard proprietary notice, so use it to learn the method, not to reuse the slides.

Cover slide: minimal, client-facing

McKinsey cover slides stay sparse: title, presenters or client, date. No agenda on the cover. No chart thumbnails.

McKinsey webcast cover: title, presenters, date. No agenda clutter.

Action title + stacked bar: one chart, one message

This slide passes the 1-3-1 check we use later in this guide: one key message, up to three supporting points in the exhibit, one clear visual.

The action title states the finding: "Growth begins in the core and top growers expand beyond the core to drive growth." The subheading defines the data: "Share of total revenue growth, N=1,874."

The stacked bars prove the title. The core business gives 69% to 90% of revenue growth in each of the eight industries shown.

Action title states the insight; the chart proves it. Source footnote bottom-left; slide number bottom-right.

Compare a weak version of the same slide:

Weak topic titleMcKinsey action title (actual)
Revenue growth by industryGrowth begins in the core and top growers expand beyond the core to drive growth

The weak title forces the reader to interpret the chart. The action title tells them what to see before they look at the bars.

MECE framework slide: mutually exclusive buckets

Consultants use framework slides to show the MECE structure before the proof. This slide groups growth levers into three pathways (core, adjacencies, breakout) under one aspiration.

Each bucket is distinct. Together they cover the growth agenda.

Framework slide: MECE pathways under one governing idea. Section titles are conclusions, not chapter names.

Numbered list slide: scannable executive read

When the exhibit is qualitative (mindsets, practices, recommendations), McKinsey uses numbered or lettered blocks with short verb-led phrases. The action title still carries the governing thought; the list proves it.

Five practices, one slide message. Each item is a complete phrase, not a fragment.

Sensitivity matrix: data proves a specific claim

Consulting charts match the comparison you need. They are not decoration.

This matrix shows the implied value per share for each combination of revenue growth and profit margin. The title explains why the exhibit exists: an external lens sets the growth ambition.

Matrix slide: action title frames the exhibit; callout boxes highlight the target zone. Labeled 'Sanitized client example.'

Venn + puzzle frameworks: visual MECE

When the argument is structural ("prioritize based on X, support through Y"), consultants use simple diagrams with restrained color. Two frameworks on one slide works only when both support the same action title.

Framework combo slide: left = how to prioritize, right = how to intervene. Source: McKinsey POP Practice.

Download the full 18-slide webcast PDF

More public McKinsey decks to study

One webcast is not enough to learn the style. These four decks are McKinsey work that the client or host published on its own website. We opened each file on October 2, 2026 to confirm the link, the date, and the page count.

DeckDate and lengthWhat to study
USPS Future Business ModelMarch 2010, 39 pagesA full storyline: recent context, base case, actions within USPS control, then fundamental change. A small section label sits above each title.
Transportation and Warehousing Sector Analysis (Federal City Council, Washington DC)October 2020, 40 pagesTitles carry a number (1b, 2a, 2b) that ties each proof slide to one of five challenges.
Financial Impact Assessment on 2020 Revenue of COVID-19 (Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York)May 2020, 38 pagesScenario analysis: two ridership scenarios run through fare, toll, and tax revenue, then one summary table. The file opens with disclaimer pages.
Context for Global Growth and Development (McKinsey Global Institute, for a UN session)November 2014, 11 pagesShort titles that each state one claim, several with a number in them. A good first deck to read.

How to study a deck in 10 minutes:

  1. Read only the titles, from first slide to last. Write down the argument in three sentences.
  2. Pick one chart slide. Cover the title and write your own. Compare it with the original.
  3. Find the executive summary or the closest slide to it. Check which body slides prove each line.
  4. Note what is missing: animation and clip art. Topic-label titles do appear (the USPS deck has "Pricing opportunities for USPS"), but they are the exception.

The USPS deck opens its context section with a five-word title: "USPS is experiencing unprecedented losses" (McKinsey, 2010). That is the standard to copy: a claim, not a label.

For larger collections, Slideworks and Slide Science both keep lists of 150 or more public McKinsey decks. Many of those links go to third-party hosts, so check the source before you rely on a file.

The five-part McKinsey deck structure

Most consulting deliverables follow the same spine. Slide counts change with the size of the project. The sections stay the same.

SectionSlides (typical)Job
1. Cover1Engagement title, client, date. Minimal.
2. Executive summary1 to 2Governing message plus 3 to 5 supporting claims. The deck in miniature.
3. Body10 to 50 or moreEvidence in MECE sections. Each section opens with its conclusion.
4. Recommendations and next steps2 to 4Numbered, verb-led actions with owners and dates.
5. AppendixOften longer than the main deckBackup charts, methodology, detailed tables. Referenced, not presented.

Slideworks, a firm of former McKinsey, BCG and Bain consultants, reports that the body of a client deliverable often has 50 or more slides and that the appendix can be much longer than the main deck. Those are their observations, not official McKinsey numbers.

Public decks are shorter. The median in the Slideworks collection is 38 pages, and the 2024 growth webcast is 18 slides.

Section 1: Cover slide

Keep three elements: project name (under about 8 words), client or audience, date. A confidentiality label is optional.

Some McKinsey decks use the client's template and logo. Others use the firm's template. It depends on how the client wants to share the work.

Section 2: Executive summary

The executive summary slide is usually the slide that takes the longest to write. It carries the governing thought: one sentence that states what the audience should believe or do.

Copy this structure. It follows Situation, Complication, Resolution:

Text
Title: [Client] should [action] to [result] by [date]

Situation: [One sentence of context that everyone in the room accepts.]
Complication: [One sentence on what changed and what it costs.]
Resolution:
1. [Key line 1 as a full sentence with a number]
2. [Key line 2 as a full sentence with a number]
3. [Key line 3 as a full sentence with a number]
Next step: [The decision you need, the owner, the date]

Below the governing thought, add 3 to 5 bullets. Each bullet is a complete claim:

Weak bullet (process)Strong bullet (finding)
We analyzed freight spend across regionsFreight costs exceed benchmark by 12% due to lane consolidation gaps
Our research found churn issuesChurn concentrates in accounts under $50K ARR: 2.4× the enterprise rate
We recommend pricing changesTiered pricing in low-churn segments can recover 80 bps margin by Q4

Executive summary bullets should mirror the action titles of the body sections, in order. The summary becomes a table of contents written as conclusions.

Section 3: Body

The body holds the quantitative and qualitative proof. Break it into 3 to 5 MECE sections. Each section starts with a section divider whose title is the conclusion of that section.

Within a section, keep one message per slide. For competitive positioning, the 2×2 matrix from our competition slide guide fits this style when you can defend both axes.

Section 4: Recommendations and next steps

Recommendations are specific and verb-led:

WeakStrong
Improve procurement efficiencyRenegotiate top-five supplier contracts by Q3 to capture $4.2M
Invest in digitalLaunch self-serve onboarding by Feb 2027 to cut CAC 18%
Fix pricingRoll out tiered pricing in Q4 for accounts with NPS above 8

Group recommendations when you have more than five. Label the groups (Quick wins, Structural, Enablers). Write in the active voice and start with a verb: Grow, Reduce, Target, Accelerate.

The next steps slide assigns an owner, a deliverable, and a date to each action. Skip vague "further analysis" rows.

ActionOwnerDeliverableDate
Approve the pilot budgetCFOSigned budgetMar 15
Renegotiate the top-five supplier contractsCPONew terms in placeJun 30
Launch tiered pricing in two regionsHead of SalesLive price listSep 1

Section 5: Appendix

The appendix holds the backup for questions: cohort cuts, survey results, model tabs, interview quotes. Presenters skip it in the meeting unless someone asks.

Refer to appendix slides from footnotes on body slides ("See A-14 for full cohort cut").

Slide anatomy, 1-3-1, and the read-through test

Every consulting slide has three required parts plus a footer:

Text
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  ACTION TITLE (complete sentence = the insight)         │
│  Subheading: what data proves the title                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                         │
│  EXHIBIT (chart, table, framework: one message)        │
│                                                         │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Source: [footnote]                    McKinsey & Co  5│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Rules:

  • Nothing in the action title that the exhibit does not support
  • Nothing in the exhibit that the action title does not need
  • Subheadings add scope: "US market, $ billions, 2020 to 2025" or "Forecasted battery cost by 2030 ($/kWh)"

The 1-3-1 check. This is our shorthand for a slide that carries one message. It is not an official McKinsey rule.

CheckRule
1 key messageOne governing thought per slide
3 supporting points maxIn bullets, chart segments, or callouts
1 clear visualOne primary exhibit; split if you need two messages

The read-through test. Read the slide titles only, in order. In PowerPoint, open Outline View, right-click the outline, and select Collapse, then Collapse All, to list the titles alone.

You should know the recommendation by the end, and each title should follow from the last. If someone has to read the chart aloud to explain the point, rewrite the title or split the slide.

The "so what" test. Read the title and ask "so what?". If the answer is a better sentence than the title, that answer is your title.

Pyramid Principle: answer first, then prove

Barbara Minto joined McKinsey in 1963 and worked there until 1973. Her Pyramid Principle stacks ideas in three levels:

Text
              [Governing recommendation]
                     /    |    \
          [Key line 1] [Key line 2] [Key line 3]
             /  \         |           /  \
       [Evidence] [Evidence] ...   [Evidence]

Top level: the answer you want approved.

Middle level: 3 to 5 supporting arguments (MECE).

Base level: data, charts, quotes, and analysis that prove each argument.

The working rule: build the pyramid from the bottom up, then present it from the top down. Most analysts want to walk through the journey. Executives want the destination first, then the map.

In deck terms, the top of the pyramid is the executive summary title. The middle level becomes your section dividers. The base becomes the body slides.

Pyramid Principle: present the governing thought first, then MECE key lines, then evidence.

Worked example: margin recovery deck

Governing thought (executive summary title): "Acme should prioritize pricing and mix to recover 200 bps margin by FY27."

Key lines (MECE):

  1. Discount depth, not volume, is the primary margin driver
  2. Three levers can recover margin without exiting mid-market
  3. Implementing all three levers yields 200 bps by FY27

Evidence slides (sample action titles under key line 1):

  • Revenue grew 8% but margin compressed as discounting outpaced volume
  • Competitors undercut list price 15% to 22% in mid-market segments
  • Discount depth correlates with churn: low-churn accounts tolerate 4% to 6% list increases

Each evidence slide is one block in the base of the pyramid. Read those three titles in order. The logic should hold without the charts.

The company and the numbers in this example are invented to show the pattern.

SCR and SCQA: the consulting storyline

The Pyramid Principle structures the argument. SCR and SCQA structure the story that leads into it. Use them for the executive summary and the first slides of the deck.

SCR (Situation → Complication → Resolution)

BeatWhat it doesExample
SituationStable context everyone acceptsRegional revenue grew 8% last year on existing product lines
ComplicationChange that breaks the status quoTwo new entrants undercut pricing 20% in our core segment
ResolutionRecommendation that resolves the complicationUnbundle enterprise tier and reinvest savings in channel incentives

SCQA (adds an explicit Question)

Insert a Question after the complication: "How do we protect share without destroying margin?" The Answer is your governing recommendation.

Use SCQA when the audience might disagree on how to frame the problem. The explicit question gets agreement on the problem before you give the answer.

Copy this SCQA opener and fill it in:

Text
Situation: [Client] has [stable fact] for [period].
Complication: [Change] now threatens [metric] by [amount].
Question: How can [client] [goal] without [trade-off]?
Answer: [Client] should [action 1], [action 2], and [action 3] to [result] by [date].
UseWhen
SCRThe audience already agrees on the problem. You go straight to the resolution.
SCQAThe problem is disputed or new. You state the question so that everyone answers the same one.

Action titles

An action title is a slide headline written as a complete sentence that states the takeaway of the slide.

Topic titles label the slide. Action titles state the insight the chart must prove.

From the 2024 webcast (actual titles):

  • "Leaders use a holistic growth blueprint to achieve sustained profitable growth"
  • "Growth begins in the core and top growers expand beyond the core to drive growth"
  • "5 practices consistently underpin growth transformation outperformers"

Action titles state a claim. Topic titles state a category. Claims give executives something to approve or push back on.

How to write action titles

  1. Finish the exhibit first (or sketch it). What is the one number or pattern that matters?
  2. Write the "so what" as a complete sentence with a subject and verb
  3. Replace vague words ("significant," "various") with numbers or comparisons
  4. Cut it to two lines. Slideworks, a firm of former consultants, sets the limit at two lines and about 15 words
  5. Read adjacent titles in sequence. If the flow breaks, rewrite before you touch chart colors

If you cannot write a clear action title, the slide probably mixes two ideas. Split it.

Action title formulas

Most action titles follow one of six patterns. Copy the one that fits your exhibit:

Text
[Metric] [rose / fell] [amount] since [date] because [driver]
[Segment A] outperforms [Segment B] by [amount] on [metric]
[Number] of [total] [items] account for [share] of [outcome]
[Option A] beats [Option B] on [criterion] at [lower cost / lower risk]
[Client] should [action] by [date] to [result]
[Risk or gap] will cost [amount] by [date] unless [action]

Action title examples you can copy

The left column is the topic label most decks use. The right column is the action title that replaces it.

The numbers are placeholders. Put in your own.

Growth and market

Topic labelAction title
Market overviewThe market grows 9% a year, and the mid-market segment grows twice as fast
Customer segmentsTwo segments produce 70% of profit but get 30% of sales time
Competitor analysisCompetitors win on price at the low end but lose on service in enterprise
Market entry optionsA partnership reaches break-even two years sooner than a solo launch
Customer researchBuyers rank delivery speed above price in four of five segments

Cost and operations

Topic labelAction title
Cost breakdownLogistics causes 40% of the cost gap against the benchmark
Procurement reviewFive suppliers hold 72% of spend, and three contracts expire this year
Process analysisRework adds six days to each order and affects one order in four
Headcount trendOverhead headcount grew 18% while revenue grew 5%
BenchmarkPeers of the same size operate with 20% fewer management layers

Pricing and margin

Topic labelAction title
Pricing analysisDiscounts above 15% do not raise win rates
Margin trendMargin fell 3 points because the mix moved to the low-margin line
Churn dataAccounts without onboarding churn at three times the rate of onboarded accounts
Scenario analysisThe plan holds in two of three scenarios, and a price war breaks it

Organization and technology

Topic labelAction title
Org structureThree teams own the same decision, which adds four weeks to each launch
Survey resultsManagers rate strategy clarity 30 points lower than executives do
Technology assessmentThe current platform cannot support more than two new markets

Recommendations, risks, and status

Topic labelAction title
RecommendationsClose two of five warehouses by Q3 to save $4M a year
Next stepsThe board should approve the pilot budget by March 15
RisksSupplier concentration is the one risk that can delay the plan
TimelineThe rollout reaches all regions in three phases over 12 months
Project statusThe program is two weeks behind because vendor selection slipped
KPI dashboardFour of six KPIs meet target, but on-time delivery and NPS do not
Financial overviewRevenue beat plan by 4%, but cash conversion fell to 61%

Do you have the titles but not the slides? Give GenPPT your recommendation and ask for action titles. It drafts an outline for you to approve before it designs anything.

MECE: organize the body without gaps or overlap

MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) is the consulting rule for grouping ideas. It is part of Minto's Pyramid Principle.

  • Mutually exclusive: each bucket belongs in one place only
  • Collectively exhaustive: together, the buckets cover everything relevant

Example: cost reduction deck:

MECE sectionIncludesExcludes
ProcurementSupplier rates, contract termsHeadcount
OperationsYield, scrap, line efficiencyMarketing spend
OverheadReal estate, shared servicesProduct COGS

MECE applies to section structure, bullet groups, and chart breakdowns. Overlapping pie segments invite a challenge in the Q&A.

Five splits that are MECE by construction:

SplitExample
MathProfit = revenue minus cost. Revenue = price times volume.
ProcessSource, make, deliver, service
SegmentsEnterprise, mid-market, small business
TimeNext 90 days, this year, years 2 to 3
OppositesInternal and external. Organic and acquired.

Two quick tests:

  • Can one item sit in two buckets? Then the buckets overlap.
  • Can you name something relevant that fits in no bucket? Then there is a gap.

McKinsey vs BCG vs Bain: same logic, different emphasis

All three firms share the same base: conclusions first, action titles, and a disciplined appendix. The visible differences are in branding:

DimensionMcKinseyBCGBain
Brand colorBlue (dark blue plus a bright blue)GreenRed
Slide fontsGeorgia for titles, Arial for body (per Slideworks)Trebuchet MS (reported)Not verified
Known forPyramid Principle, MECEGrowth-share matrix (the BCG matrix)Net Promoter Score

The McKinsey colors and fonts come from the Slideworks analysis of the identity that the firm introduced in February 2019. The BCG font is reported by former consultants, and we did not verify it against a firm document.

Treat every style comparison between the firms with care. Decks differ more by team and client than by firm. You do not need a firm-branded template to apply the logic: pick one palette and one font pair, and enforce action titles.

Ghost deck: structure before design

Consultants build a ghost deck first: every slide title in final order, placeholder boxes for exhibits, no polished design.

Ghost deck: validate action-title flow in slide sorter before you design charts.

Workflow:

  1. Write the governing thought for the executive summary
  2. List 3 to 5 key lines that support it (MECE)
  3. Under each key line, draft action titles for the proof slides
  4. Add the recommendation and next steps titles
  5. Run the read-through test
  6. Only then design charts and pick layouts

A common habit is to sketch the sections on paper, build empty slides with titles only, print them, and lay them on a table to check the flow. PowerPoint Slide Sorter view does the same job.

The ghost deck also tells you which analysis to do. An empty exhibit box with a clear title is a work order: find the data that proves or disproves this sentence.

GenPPT works in the same order. It drafts the outline first, you approve it, and only then does it generate the slides.

The 10 slide types that cover most consulting decks

You do not need 50 layouts. These ten cover most of what a consulting deck has to say.

Slide typeUse it whenTitle pattern
Executive summaryThe reader needs the full answer on one page[Client] should [action] to [result]
Single-chart slideOne number or trend proves the point[Metric] [changed] [amount] because [driver]
Framework or pillarsYou group levers or options into MECE bucketsThree levers close the gap
Issue treeYou split a question into parts to analyzeThe gap comes from price, volume, and mix
Waterfall (bridge)You explain how one number becomes anotherDiscounts explain most of the margin decline
2×2 matrixYou position options on two axesTwo initiatives are high impact and low effort
Comparison tableYou rate options against criteriaOption B meets four of five criteria
RoadmapYou show the sequence of actionsThe plan delivers in three phases over 12 months
Section dividerA new section startsThe conclusion of the section, as a sentence
Next stepsYou need decisions, owners, and datesThe board should approve [decision] by [date]

For the comparison table, Harvey balls show ratings at a glance without a column of numbers.

Charts and design rules

Pick the chart for the comparison you need:

When you need to show…Chart typeAction title pattern
Change over timeLine chart"X grew N% while Y flatlined since 2022"
Contribution to a totalWaterfall / bridge"Margin erosion is driven primarily by discount depth"
Part-to-whole at one pointStacked bar (100%)"Growth begins in the core across every sector"
Two-axis positioning2×2 matrix"We win in the empty quadrant on price vs service"
Scenario sensitivityTable / matrix"Share price requires 6.5%+ CAGR at 13%+ margin"
Before vs afterSide-by-side bars"Pilot cut fulfillment time 40% in six weeks"
Rank orderHorizontal bar"Top three suppliers account for 72% of spend"

Design rules:

RuleWhat consultants do
One message per slideSplit dual-chart slides
Action title + exhibit + footnoteTitle = insight; body = proof; footer = source
Restrained paletteNavy, white, one accent
Consistent typography2 to 3 sizes at most; titles of two lines or less
No animationStatic slides for boardrooms and PDFs
Appendix disciplineMove detail that invites debate to the backup
  • One message per chart. Two messages need two charts
  • Direct labels on bars and lines, so that the reader does not hunt through a legend
  • A callout box for the one number the reader must remember
  • A source line on every exhibit. Label estimates as estimates

For waterfall and Mekko charts that stay linked to Excel inside PowerPoint, see think-cell alternatives.

Set up a McKinsey-style PowerPoint template

McKinsey's brand fonts are Bower (serif) and McKinsey Sans. In PowerPoint files the firm replaces them with Georgia for titles and Arial for body text, because custom fonts make files hard to share with clients. This is the Slideworks analysis of the identity from February 2019.

You can build a template in that style in the Slide Master. The settings below are our recommendations from public decks. They are not an official McKinsey specification.

ElementSetting
Slide sizeWidescreen 16:9
TitleGeorgia, top left, room for two lines, no bold
Body and chart labelsArial, one size for body, one smaller size for labels and sources
ColorsWhite background, dark blue text and shapes, one bright blue accent, two grays
SubheadingOne line under the title that names the data, unit, and period
FooterSource line bottom left, page number bottom right
Section trackerSmall section label above the title, optional

Steps in PowerPoint:

  1. Open View, then Slide Master.
  2. Select Fonts, then Customize Fonts. Set the heading font to Georgia and the body font to Arial.
  3. Select Colors, then Customize Colors. Enter your dark blue, bright blue, and grays.
  4. On the top master slide, move the title placeholder to the top left. On each exhibit layout, select Insert Placeholder, then Text, and draw a source line at the bottom left.
  5. Keep six layouts and delete the rest: cover, executive summary, title plus one exhibit, title plus two columns, section divider, and end slide.
  6. Close the master view and save the file as a PowerPoint Template (.potx).

To change a template that you already have, see how to edit a PowerPoint template.

Copy-ready template: 8-slide main path

Use this interactive outline, then download the PDF template or open it in GenPPT.

McKinsey-style consulting deck (8 slides)

Slide 1 of 8💡 No agenda on the cover

Cover: [Engagement title], [Client], [Date]

Project name under 8 words

Client name or logo

Date and confidentiality label if needed

Try this in GenPPT

Create this presentation in seconds

Create this deck

Move methodology, survey tabs, and model backups to the appendix. Refer to them from footnotes on body slides.

Eight slides fit a short decision meeting. For a longer readout, use the 15-slide template below.

Template slide previews

Our downloadable 8-slide PDF uses the 8-slide structure above. Preview:

Template slide 2: executive summary with governing-thought placeholder.
Full 8-slide template contact sheet: download the PDF or recreate in GenPPT.

Slide-by-slide template: 15-slide consulting deck

Use this when the decision needs more proof than eight slides can hold. Each row gives the job of the slide and a title formula to fill in.

#SlideTitle formula
1Cover[Project name], [client], [date]
2Executive summary[Client] should [action] to [result] by [date]
3Situation[Metric] has held at [level] since [year]
4Complication[Change] now puts [metric] at risk of [consequence]
5Answer overviewThree levers close the gap: [A], [B], and [C]
6Lever A, proof 1[Driver] explains [share] of the gap
7Lever A, proof 2[Segment] has the largest upside at [amount]
8Lever B, proof 1[Lever B] can deliver [impact] without [trade-off]
9Lever B, proof 2[Peer or benchmark] already operates at [level]
10Lever C, proof[Lever C] adds [impact] at [cost or risk]
11OptionsOption [X] gives the highest return for the lowest risk
12Total impactTogether the three levers deliver [total] by [date]
13RisksThree risks matter most, and each has a mitigation
14RoadmapThe plan delivers in three phases over [N] months
15Next steps[Owner] should approve [decision] by [date] to start phase 1

Slides 3 and 4 are the Situation and Complication. Slide 5 is the middle level of the pyramid. Slides 6 to 10 are the base.

Three rules for when you adapt it:

  • Keep the balance. The first four slides set up the answer and the last three turn it into action. Everything between is proof.
  • Add proof slides, not sections. If a lever needs a third chart, add it under that lever.
  • Send the rest to the appendix. Methodology, data tables, and the options you rejected go behind slide 15.

Consulting-style deck topics to start from

No project at hand? Practice the structure on one of these. Each row starts a deck with that topic in GenPPT.

Common mistakes (and fixes)

MistakeWhy it failsFix
Topic titles ("Financial overview")Reader must interpret the chartRewrite as action titles
Recommendation lastExecutives stop listeningLead exec summary with the answer
Two messages on one slideBreaks read-through testSplit into two slides
Bullets start with "We analyzed…"Process, not findingState the finding only
Chart junk / 3D effectsHides the dataFlat charts, direct labels
No sources on estimatesCFO will challenge in Q&AFootnote every exhibit
Walking through the appendixBurns time on non-decisionsStay on main path; offer backup on demand
Paste-up from multiple decksInconsistent logicRebuild ghost deck from governing thought

Send the executive summary to the key stakeholders before the steering meeting. Consultants call this pre-wiring. The meeting then confirms a decision instead of producing surprises.

Checklist before you send the deck

Run these eight checks in order. Each takes a minute or two.

  1. Titles only. Read every title in sequence. Do they give the full argument?
  2. Slide 2. Does the executive summary state the recommendation and the decision you need?
  3. One message. Does any slide need "and" to describe its point? Split it.
  4. Title matches exhibit. Does every chart prove exactly what its title says?
  5. Numbers. Does every number in a title appear in the exhibit below it?
  6. Sources. Does every exhibit have a source line, with estimates labeled?
  7. Two lines. Is every title two lines or less?
  8. Appendix. Have you moved every slide that does not change the decision?

When McKinsey-style slides are the wrong fit

Use a different structure when:

  • You are fundraising. Investor pitches go from problem to market to traction to the ask. See our pitch deck hub and the 10-20-30 rule.
  • You report weekly status. A steering committee wants red, amber, green at a glance. Use the project status report template.
  • You are teaching. Training decks need step-by-step slides. Break the "answer first" rule on purpose.
  • You have five minutes. A three-slide brief beats a 40-slide consulting pack. Match the slide count to your slot with how many slides per minute.
  • You tell a story to a large room. Keynotes use few words and large images. Dense exhibits do not work from the back row.

Build with GenPPT

GenPPT makes the first full draft of a consulting-style deck. You give it a prompt, a PDF, a Word document, a text file, images, or a link.

It researches the topic and drafts an outline. You approve the outline, pick a visual concept, and get designed slides about 2 to 3 minutes later.

  1. Open the McKinsey slide generator and enter your governing recommendation, or paste the prompt from the top of this page into GenPPT
  2. Read the outline before you approve it. If a title is only a topic label, ask in chat for an action title
  3. Upload the template contact sheet as a style reference if you want the navy and white look
  4. Edit single slides in chat until the titles and exhibits agree
  5. Export .pptx or PDF, then read the titles alone once more before the meeting

Know the limits. GenPPT slides are full-slide designs, so charts are not linked to Excel. Check every number and claim yourself.

For exhibits that must stay linked to a model, rebuild those charts in PowerPoint or think-cell after export.

The price: a $1 trial gives you 3 days of full access (card required). After that it is $25 a month or $99 a year for 20 decks a month, with PowerPoint and PDF export without a watermark. There is no free plan.

You can also open the consulting deck template to preview the slides and download the PDF. If your source is a long report, see PDF to PowerPoint with AI.

FAQ

What is a McKinsey-style slide?

It is a slide with a full-sentence action title, one exhibit that proves the title, and a source line. The title states a conclusion, not a topic. The deck around it puts the recommendation first and groups the proof into MECE sections.

What is an action title?

An action title is a slide title written as a complete sentence that states the conclusion of the slide. "Logistics causes 40% of the cost gap" is an action title. "Cost analysis" is a topic label. Keep action titles to two lines.

How many slides are in a McKinsey presentation?

It depends on the type of deck. Slideworks, a firm of former consultants, reports that the body of a client deliverable often has 50 or more slides, with an appendix that can be longer. Public decks are shorter: the median in the Slideworks collection is 38 pages, and the 2024 growth webcast linked above is 18 slides.

What font does McKinsey use?

McKinsey's brand fonts are Bower and McKinsey Sans. In PowerPoint the firm uses Georgia for titles and Arial for body text, according to the Slideworks analysis of the identity from February 2019. A consistent hierarchy matters more than a match with the firm's fonts.

Does McKinsey have an official PowerPoint template?

McKinsey uses its own template internally, and we found no official public download. Files sold or shared online as a "McKinsey PPT template" are third-party templates in the same style. You can set up your own or start from our 8-slide template PDF.

Can I download real McKinsey slides?

Yes, when the client or McKinsey has published them. This guide links four public decks on the USPS, Federal City Council, MTA, and UN websites, plus the 2024 webcast PDF. Internal client decks stay confidential, and public decks stay under McKinsey's copyright, so study them but do not copy slides.

Can AI build McKinsey-style slides?

Yes, for structure and a first designed draft. GenPPT drafts an outline from a prompt or a PDF, and you approve it before the slides are generated. Ask for action titles in the prompt, verify the numbers yourself, and rebuild Excel-linked charts in PowerPoint for board-ready exhibits.

Generate McKinsey-style slides

Ilias Ism
Ilias Ism

SEO strategist and former CTO who builds scalable content systems. Founded LinkDR, MagicSpace SEO, AISEOTracker, and GenPPT.

  • Built and sold Officient ($500k+ MRR)
  • Scaled 20+ products generating $10M+ revenue
  • 4x B2B SaaS founder
Create deck
AI presentations

Stop stressing over formatting. Join 100,000+ professionals creating presentations worth presenting.