Tome and Gamma both helped popularize AI-first presentations in the browser. Tome discontinued its presentation product, so anyone still searching "Tome vs Gamma" is choosing between active tools. Gamma remains the fastest path to scrollable, web-native card decks. GenPPT targets teams who want full-slide visuals and a PowerPoint export they can hand off without rebuilding layouts.

This guide compares all three on format, export, workflow, and pricing. It also points you to maintained alternatives if you came here from an old Tome bookmark.

Tome vs Gamma vs GenPPT at a glance

Prices checked against official pages in August 2026. Gamma uses credits on the free tier; GenPPT offers a first deck free with no credit card.

Web-native cards vs full-slide export: why it matters

Most "Tome vs Gamma" comparisons focus on speed and AI polish. The decision that actually sticks is where the deck lives after generation.

Web-native card decks (Gamma, and Tome before shutdown) treat each section like a webpage block: scroll vertically, edit text inline, share a live link. Presentation mode still works, but the native format is cards in the browser.

Full-slide export decks (GenPPT) render one designed image per slide. Layout, typography, charts, and imagery bake in. Then you export to .pptx or PDF. You trade draggable text boxes for visual consistency and a file that opens cleanly in PowerPoint.

If your team standardizes on PowerPoint, prioritize export fidelity. If you present from the browser and rarely download files, Gamma's card model is hard to beat on speed.

For teams leaving Prezi's zoom canvas for linear slides, our Best Prezi Alternatives guide covers similar format tradeoffs.

Tome (discontinued): what to use instead

Tome launched as an AI narrative presentation tool, part deck builder and part storytelling canvas. It generated scrollable pages with embedded media and felt closer to a microsite than a classic slide deck.

In 2024, Tome discontinued its presentation product and pivoted away from consumer deck creation. Existing Tome decks may no longer be accessible, and there is no supported path to create new presentations on the platform.

What Tome users typically miss:

• Fast AI first drafts from a short prompt
• Web-native sharing without opening PowerPoint
• Polished, editorial layouts with minimal design work

What to use instead in 2026:

Our dedicated Tome alternative page walks through GenPPT's workflow for teams migrating off Tome.

Gamma: fast web-native card decks

Best for: Teams that present from the browser, iterate quickly on copy, and share live links
Tradeoff: PowerPoint export works but is not the native format. Complex card layouts can lose spacing or typography in .pptx

Gamma is the active tool closest to what Tome offered: prompt-to-deck, AI-written copy, and a card-based editor you refine in the browser. It also supports docs and lightweight websites from the same interface.

Strengths:

• Speed: One of the fastest prompt-to-presentable flows we tested
• Browser-native editing: Adjust cards inline without export round-trips
• Collaboration: Real-time co-editing and comments on paid tiers
• Flexible output: Share link, PDF, or PowerPoint export

Limitations:

• Export fidelity: Simple decks export fine; multi-column cards, custom spacing, and embedded blocks can shift in PowerPoint
• Credit model: Free tier uses credits; heavy users hit limits faster than flat monthly plans
• Visual model: Cards with text blocks, not full-bleed designed slide images

Pricing (August 2026, from Gamma):

• Free: signup credits for trying AI generation
• Plus: roughly $10/month (annual billing often cheaper) for more credits, branding removal, and advanced features

For a direct GenPPT comparison, read our Gamma alternative page.

GenPPT: full-slide export for PowerPoint workflows

Best for: Decks that must open in PowerPoint with designed visuals: board updates, client pitches, training slides from documents
Tradeoff: Slides are rendered images, not draggable text boxes. No real-time multi-user canvas editing

GenPPT targets a different bottleneck than Gamma: handoff quality. Instead of card blocks you edit in-browser, each slide is a designed image with layout, type, charts, and imagery rendered together.

How the workflow differs:

1. Add a prompt, PDF, Word doc, or link
2. Review and edit the slide-by-slide outline before design starts
3. Pick a visual direction from a concept contact sheet
4. Generate the deck, regenerate individual slides in chat
5. Export .pptx or PDF

That outline-and-concept step adds a few minutes upfront but reduces rework when the deck must survive PowerPoint on someone else's laptop.

Strengths:

• PowerPoint export: Native .pptx from full-slide visuals
• Document input: PDFs, Word files, and links, not just a one-line prompt
• Research depth: Optional web search for facts and citations
• Visual consistency: One designed image per slide, not rearranged template blocks

Limitations:

• Not a card editor: You refine via outline + chat regeneration, not inline text boxes on each card
• No real-time co-editing: Teams review exports or share async
• Generation time: Budget a few minutes for outline, concept, and render, not sub-minute drafts

Pricing (August 2026, from GenPPT):

• Free: first deck without a credit card
• Paid: from ~$19/month or $99/year after a $1 trial; watermark-free export and higher limits (pricing →)

Create your first deck free →

Tome vs Gamma vs GenPPT: full comparison table

Which tool should you pick?

Choose Gamma if you want the closest active replacement for Tome's fast browser workflow, you present from a share link, and occasional .pptx export is good enough for simple decks.

Choose GenPPT if PowerPoint handoff is non-negotiable, you start from documents or need outline control before visuals render, and you want full-slide design rather than card blocks.

Do not choose Tome for new work. The presentation app is discontinued. Migrate existing content to Gamma or GenPPT depending on whether you prioritize browser editing or PowerPoint export.

Still comparing broadly? Our Best AI PowerPoint Generators roundup tests 12+ tools with the same briefs, including Gamma and GenPPT side by side.

Frequently asked questions

Is Tome still available in 2026?

No. Tome discontinued its AI presentation product. You cannot rely on it for new decks. Use Gamma for web-native card decks or GenPPT for full-slide PowerPoint export.

Is Gamma better than Tome was?

For active users, yes. Gamma is the maintained option with a similar fast, browser-first workflow. Tome's narrative polish was distinctive, but without ongoing support, Gamma is the practical successor for new decks.

Tome vs Gamma: which is better for PowerPoint export?

Neither is ideal if PowerPoint fidelity is the top priority. Gamma exports .pptx but its native format is web cards, so layout can shift. GenPPT is built around full-slide .pptx export. If you must live in PowerPoint, compare GenPPT vs Gamma directly.

What is the best Tome alternative after shutdown?

GenPPT works when you want designed slides and .pptx export from prompts or documents. Gamma works when you want the fastest browser-native drafts. See our Tome alternative page for workflow details.

Gamma vs GenPPT: which is faster?

Gamma is usually faster from prompt to first draft because it skips outline and concept approval. GenPPT adds those steps but produces full-slide visuals tuned for export. Expect 2–3 minutes of generation on either tool, plus review time.

Can I upload a PDF to Gamma or GenPPT?

Yes. Both accept document input. GenPPT emphasizes outline approval before rendering so extracted metrics and slide order match your source. For a step-by-step PDF workflow, read PDF to PowerPoint with AI.

Do these tools replace Prezi's zoom canvas?

No. Gamma and GenPPT produce linear slide decks, not zoomable canvas paths. If you are leaving Prezi, read Best Prezi Alternatives for format-specific picks.

How much do Gamma and GenPPT cost?

Gamma offers free signup credits; paid Plus plans start around $10/month (August 2026). GenPPT offers a free first deck; paid plans start around $19/month or $99/year after a $1 trial. Check each vendor's pricing page for current limits.

Conclusion: pick an active tool for your export path

The old Tome vs Gamma debate assumed two live products with similar web-native ambitions. In 2026, Tome is out of the running. Your real choice is Gamma for browser-first card decks or GenPPT for full-slide PowerPoint export.

If you are not sure yet, run the same brief through both. Or start with GenPPT if your deck must survive a .pptx handoff:

Create your first GenPPT deck free →

For deeper comparisons, see Gamma alternative, Tome alternative, and Best AI PowerPoint Generators.